Overview of Daniel
The Book of Daniel is a well-structured literary work. It is not a collection of folk stories or random and unrelated visions. Its key themes are presented in brief at the start of the Book. They are described in detail in the Book’s subsequent chapters as each new vision builds on the preceding ones.
The historical stories in the
first six chapters lay the foundation for the visions and their interpretations
in the last six chapters. For example, King Nebuchadnezzar’s dream of the “great
image” composed of four materials anticipates the vision of the “four
beasts ascending from the sea” in Chapter 7.
![]() |
[Photo by Jakob Braun on Unsplash] |
Each vision includes one or more common subjects. For example, the cessation of the daily sacrifice is mentioned in the visions of the Ram and the Goat, the Seventy Weeks, and the Kings of the North and South, as well as in the conclusion to the Book - (Daniel 8:10-13, 9:26-27, 11:31, 12:11).
The name ‘Daniel’ means “God
is my judge.” He first appears as a young Jewish exile just arrived in
Babylon from Jerusalem. No information is provided about his family
history. He was from the nobility - “Of the seed royal and the nobles.”
Daniel was probably in his
teenage years when he was deported. He received his final vision in the third
year after the overthrow of Babylon by the “Medes and Persians.”
That means his prophetic “career” spanned
over seventy years. There is no record of him ever returning to Judah. Presumably,
he died in Babylon at an advanced age.
Daniel was given the Babylonian
name ‘Belteshazzar,’ which means “Bel protects [the king].” ‘Bel’ is the
Akkadian form of ‘Ba’al’ (“lord, master”) applied in Mesopotamia to
the patron deity of Babylon, Marduk.
Daniel is classified as a
prophet in Jewish and Christian tradition. In the Book, he is a “wise man”
with great “discernment.” In the royal court, he was noted as a
great interpreter of dreams - (Daniel 1:17, 2:13, 5:11-12).
He was a devout Jew living in a
pagan culture. At times, certain members of the inner court were hostile to him,
though he remained loyal to the God of Israel. His ability to interpret dreams
won him high praise and an important position in the civil service of the
Empire. Later, he served in the court of “Darius the Mede” after the fall
of the Neo-Babylonian Empire - (Daniel 5:31-6:1).
DANIEL AND POLITICAL POWER
The Book describes the role of
the prophet in affecting events in the affairs of the Babylonian and Persian
empires. His visions concerned the changing World Empire and the control
of the God of Israel over History.
Daniel epitomized the faithful
Jew who lived by Divine grace in a pagan society. He persevered despite the
downfall of the Jewish nation and his vulnerability to powerful forces. Yahweh
provided him with wisdom to confound his opponents. Though powerless, God used his
pronouncements to kings to change the course of history.
Daniel served the governments of
Nebuchadnezzar, Belshazzar, and “Darius the Mede.” Nebuchadnezzar made him
the “chief of the wise men” and governor of
the province of Babylon. Belshazzar appointed him as the third
ruler of his kingdom. After Babylon fell, “Darius the Mede” placed him
over the provincial governors of his domain - (Daniel 2:48, 5:29, 6:1-3).
All the events portrayed in the Book occurred during the Seventy-Year Captivity of the Jewish nation, a judgment of Yahweh to punish Judah for her sins.
Nebuchadnezzar defeated the
remnants of the Assyrian Empire, and he subjugated the nations of
northern Palestine, around 605 B.C. This conquest included the Kingdom of Judah.
The region was known as the “Hatti-land” by the Babylonians (“All the kings of
the Hatti-land came before Nebuchadnezzar and he received their heavy tribute”
– from the Chaldean Chronicle, quoted from Exile and Return by
Charles Pfeiffer, Baker Books, 1962, p. 12).
In the case of Judah, “heavy
tribute” was imposed including the deportation of many Jews to serve in Babylon’s
civil service. In the assessment of the Book of Daniel, the Seventy-Year
Captivity of the Jews began with the subjugation of Jerusalem by Nebuchadnezzar
- (Daniel 1:1-4).
The rise of Nabopolassar to the Babylonian throne in 626 B.C.
marked the start of the Neo-Babylonian Empire. It endured until 539 B.C. when
it was overthrown by the “Kingdom of the Medes and the Persians,” the Achaemenid
Empire under the rule of Cyrus the Great. Daniel includes chronological
references that coordinate key events with the reigns of the kings
of Judah, Babylon, Persia, and Greece - (Daniel 1:1-2, 1:21, 6:28-31, 11:1-4).
The Book applies a theologically
loaded term to the period it covers, the “indignation,” the divinely
ordained period of correction. When Daniel spoke of the “time of the end,”
he meant the end of the “indignation,” not the end of History or the
world. The “indignation” also provides another chronological marker that
connects several of his visions - (Daniel 8:17-19, 11:36).
In the Hebrew Bible, “indignation”
refers to the Indignation of God with Israel for her sins and
the resultant punishment. It began with the overthrow and captivity of Judah.
This period is called the “desolations of Jerusalem.” During this
period, the “Little Horn” waged war against the “saints” for “time,
times, and part of a time,” and desecrated the Temple of Jerusalem with the
“Abomination that Desolates” - (Daniel 7:24-28, 9:1-3, 9:18-27, 12:1-7).
The Book was composed after the
start of the Captivity and completed by the early years of the Persian Empire.
The range provided is from the “third year of the reign of King Jehoiakim”
(606 B.C.) to the “third year of Cyrus king of Persia” or 536 B.C. - (Daniel
1:1-2, 1:21, 5:31-6:1, 10:1).
The Babylonian Captivity
developed over several stages, beginning in 605 B.C. with the subjugation of
Jerusalem in the first year of Nebuchadnezzar’s reign. It culminated in the destruction
of the city and Temple in 587-586 B.C. There were at least three deportations of
Jewish exiles to Babylon - (606, 598, 587 B.C.).
The historical sections describe
events in the lives of Daniel and three of his companions. The visions of the Book’s
second half were received between the first year of Belshazzar’s reign and the
third year of Cyrus the Great.
FOURFOLD PATTERN
The visions are built on a
framework of four successive kingdoms that would precede the inauguration
of the Kingdom of God. Three of the four kingdoms are identified by name
- Babylon, the “Medes and Persians”, and Greece. Though not named,
the fourth kingdom was one of the four divisions of the Greek Empire that arose
after the death of its first king, Alexander the Great - (Daniel 2:24-45, 8:20-25, 11:1-4).
The theme of the Book is that God
rules over the kingdoms of this world and gives rulership to whomever He
pleases, “even to the lowest of men.” Despite appearances and human machinations,
His purposes are not thwarted by even the mightiest of empires.
Chapters 1, and 8 through 12, were
written in the Hebrew Language. The section in Chapters 2 through 7 was composed
in the Aramaic dialect of the Persian Empire. The switch to Aramaic occurs
in Daniel 2:4 when the “Chaldeans spoke to the king in the Syrian
language,” meaning Aramaic. The change back to Hebrew occurs in Daniel
8:1. The change is too specific to be accidental.
The Hebrew and Aramaic sections point to a date of composition during the Babylonian Captivity. The man who wrote the book was familiar with both languages and used grammatical and idiomatic features peculiar to the Mesopotamian region and its Aramaic dialect.
The several stories in the
Aramaic section show how God gave Daniel “knowledge and skill in all
learning and wisdom,” and enabled him to use the language and learning of
the Chaldeans to prove that Yahweh rules over the political realms of the world.
The use of the Aramaic language fits
the historical setting. By the time of Nebuchadnezzar, it was the de facto
language of diplomacy and commerce among the nations of the Near East, and
it became the common tongue of many Jews by the end of Judah’s Captivity - (2
Kings 18:17-37, Ezra 4:11-22, 5:7-17, 6:6-12, 7:11-26, Nehemiah 8:8).
The contents of the Aramaic
section concern events that occurred during the Babylonian Empire, and in the
first years of the “Kingdom of the Medes and the Persians.” The visions described
in Hebrew were about events that would transpire after the fall of the Neo-Babylonian
Empire.
IN REVELATION
Verbal allusions from Daniel
are used repeatedly in the Book of Revelation, and that source
material often sheds light on the symbolism of Revelation.
For example, the “Little Horn”
that “made war with the saints and prevailed against them” is echoed in the
visions of the “Beast from the Sea” that waged war “against the
saints.” John’s single “Beast” combined the characteristics of all
four of Daniel’s “Beasts from the Sea” - (Daniel 7:1-8, Revelation
11:7, 13:1-2).
However, Revelation does
not simply quote verses from Daniel. It reinterprets them in consideration
of the Death and Resurrection of Jesus. Events predicted in Daniel for “latter
days” become “what things much come to pass soon” in Revelation.
Daniel was told to “seal”
the Book “until the time of the end,” whereas, John was commanded not “to
seal the Scroll, for the season is at hand” - (Daniel 2:27-28, 12:4,
Revelation 1:1-3, 22:10).
Thus, the events Daniel foresaw that
would occur in the future, John witnessed unfolding in his day. In Revelation,
descriptions of visions are often accompanied by explicit and more detailed
explanations than those provided in Daniel.
[PDF Copy]
SEE ALSO:
- Land of Shinar - (The arrogant acts of Nebuchadnezzar in the Book of Daniel parallel the incident at the Tower of Babel in Genesis)
- Empires Rise and Fall - (Imperial arrogance is the legacy of the Tower of Babel, humanity’s first but certainly not last attempt to establish the World Empire)
- God Gave - (God gave the kingdom of Judah into the hands of Nebuchadnezzar, but He also equipped Daniel and his companions for service in the court of Babylon)
Comments
Post a Comment
We encourage free discussions on the commenting system provided by the Google Blogger platform, with the stipulation that conversations remain civil. Comments voicing dissenting views are encouraged.