Neither Jew nor Greek
Returning to the custodianship of the Law would mean rebuilding the wall between Jews and Gentiles, but “you are all one in Christ.”
The Apostle Paul compared the Mosaic Law
to a “pedagogue” in its supervision of Israel “until the seed came.”
That “Seed” was Jesus. In Greco-Roman society, the “pedagogue” was a
slave with custodial and disciplinary authority over an underage child until he
reached maturity. The minority status of the child and the authority of the
custodian over him were both temporary.
Before
the arrival of the “Seed,” all things were confined under the dominion
of sin, just as the Jews were kept under the Law until the faith was
revealed in Jesus. The Law guarded Israel until the “faith came.”
Its purpose was to make them aware of their transgressions.
[Photo by Sebastian Knoll on Unsplash] |
Likewise, the supervisory role of the Law would only last until the “faith was revealed… the promise from the faith of Jesus given to those who believe.” With the coming of the “Seed,” no longer were we under the custodianship of the Law.
- (Galatians 3:23-25) – “Before the coming of the faith, however, we were kept in ward under the law, being shut up until the faith which should afterward be revealed. So that, the law has proved our custodian, training us for Christ, so that, from faith, we might be declared righteous. But the faith having come, no longer are we under a custodian.”
The
analogy emphasizes the temporal aspect of the Law. If
the heir in the analogy was no longer under the custodian’s authority, then
believers were no longer under the jurisdiction of the Mosaic legislation. However,
if the Law could not acquit anyone before God, and if it was added after the
“promise” and could not modify it, what was its purpose?
Paul
addressed this question. The Law was given to teach Israel that sin constitutes
transgression of the expressed will of God. The Law was assigned to guard the
nation until the promised "Seed" arrived. Its custodial
function was temporary and provisional.
In
Paul’s larger argument, the temporal aspect of the Law is
prominent. It was given as an interim stage in God’s larger
redemptive program. With the arrival of the “Seed,” the jurisdiction
of the Law reached its termination point and no longer determined who was in
the covenant community and who was not. Paul highlighted the social
implications of this change:
- (Galatians 3:26-29): “For you all are sons of God through the faith in Christ Jesus; For you, as many as into Christ have been baptized, have put on Christ. There cannot be Jew or Greek, there cannot be slave or free, there cannot be male and female, for all are one in Christ Jesus. Now, if you are of Christ, by consequence, you are Abraham’s seed, according to promise, heirs.”
NO GOING BACK
Returning
to the custodianship of the Law would mean regression to an earlier stage in
the plan of Redemption, one that was characterized by separation between
Jews and Gentiles, a barrier now eliminated through the Death of Jesus.
This
paragraph is pivotal to the Letter since it stresses the oneness of
God's people. The old social distinctions were inappropriate since the
“promised Seed” had arrived. To pressure others to pursue a Torah-observant
lifestyle would rebuild the old and now outdated barriers.
One function of the Ancient Law was to keep Israelites distinct from Gentiles, and this was by design. The arrival of Jesus meant a new basis for defining and delimiting the people of God had come into existence.
Before
his advent, uncircumcised Gentiles were outside the Abrahamic Covenant, and
therefore, not “sons of God.” They could only become members of the
covenant community by undergoing circumcision and otherwise adopting a Torah-observant
lifestyle. Effectively, they ceased to be Gentiles and became Jews.
The Law
also distinguished between slaves and freemen, male and female. Women could not
keep certain requirements of the Law or participate fully in corporate worship
in the Temple because of periodic uncleanness from menstruation. Women were
restricted to the Court of Women at a further distance from
the presence of Yahweh. Religiously speaking, they were second-class citizens. Embracing
a Torah-observant lifestyle would reinstitute this inequity.
Paul’s
phrase in the passage “you are all” refers to Gentile and Jewish
believers (“That the promise should be given to those who believe”).
Before the coming of the “Seed,” all things were under confinement, both
Jews and Gentiles. Now, both groups are no longer under the jurisdiction of sin
or the Law; both have become sons of God “through the faith of Christ Jesus.”
Several
times in Galatians Paul emphasizes the word “all.” Both
believing Jews and Gentiles have been made “sons of God” through his
faithful act on their behalf and their faith in what God did in His son. It is
“in Christ” that all believers become “sons of God” and “Abraham's
seed, heirs according to promise.”
This
does not mean that ethnicity and gender no longer matter in the daily lives of
believers. However, such distinctions are irrelevant to anyone’s standing
before God or membership in His covenant community. All men and women of the “faith
of Jesus” are heirs of the covenant promises.
Unfortunately,
there is a modern doctrinal system that maintains the distinctions between Jews
and Gentiles. Your place in the plan of God once again becomes dependent on ethnicity
far more than faith or obedience, making God a “respecter of persons,”
and rendering the death of Jesus on behalf of all men pointless. “If righteousness is
through the law, then Christ died in vain.”
[PDF Copy]
SEE ALSO:
- The Assembly of God - (The term “assembly” or ‘ekklésia’ in the New Testament is derived from the Assembly of Yahweh gathered for worship recorded in the Hebrew Bible)
- The Inheritance of the Saints - (Believers are the heirs of Abraham and possession of the inheritance is guaranteed by the gift of the Spirit)
- Heirs of the Promise - (With the outpouring of the Spirit on the Day of Pentecost, the blessings for all nations promised to Abraham commenced)
Comments
Post a Comment
We encourage free discussions on the commenting system provided by the Google Blogger platform, with the stipulation that conversations remain civil. Comments voicing dissenting views are encouraged.