Synopsis: The Law was an
interim stage; by design, it had a termination point. Christian believers are
no longer “under the Law”; they are “in Christ" - Galatians 4:1-7.
In
the fourth chapter of his letter to the Galatians, Paul continues his argument
by stressing that adopting the rite of circumcision would constitute a regression
to something rudimentary, a reversion to an earlier stage in Redemptive History
(Galatians 4:1-7).
The
adoption of a Torah-compliant lifestyle means a return to a
minority status and the reintroduction of social divisions. Not only so, but it
also constitutes enslavement under the “elemental” forces of the old era
that were superseded by the arrival of the Messiah. “Elemental principles”
translates a single Greek noun, stoicheion, a term that refers
to the basic components that comprise a larger whole. Its sense is something
that is “elemental, a first principle, rudimentary.”
In
Greek literature, stoicheion refers to the elemental principles of art,
science, and discipline. From this came the idea of “elementary principles.” It
could refer to a single letter, a part of a word or phrase. It conveys the idea
of something rudimentary and simple (compare Hebrews 5:12).
To adopt circumcision now that Jesus has come is to regress to that which is rudimentary and incomplete. It is comparable to an adult who, though he possesses his inheritance, chooses to return to minority status under the custodianship of a pedagogue.
By
“elemental principles” Paul has in view the regulations of the Mosaic
Law. This is borne out by his usage of stoicheion in verses
9-10 where he describes Jewish calendrical observances: “but now that ye
have come to know God…how turn you back again to the weak and beggarly
elemental principles (stoicheion), unto which you desire to be
in bondage over again? You observe days, and months, and seasons, and years.”
For
a Gentile to submit to the regulations of the Torah is
tantamount to returning to the elemental teachings of the pagan society from
which God had delivered them through faith in His son. Likewise, Jesus freed
Jewish believers from being under the regulations of the Torah. Its
requirements were needed during Israel's minority but not after the promised
"seed," the Messiah, had arrived. Non-Jewish Christians should
not, therefore, submit to the rituals that Jewish followers of Jesus were no
longer required to keep.
“God
sent forth his Son, having come to be from woman, having come to be under law.”
Jesus was born a Jew under the covenant obligations of the Torah until
the fullness of time came. Once more, Paul sets temporal limits on the Law’s
jurisdiction.
Jesus
came in order to redeem them “who were under the Law, so that they could
receive the adoption of sons.” This refers to Jews and, especially, to Jewish
Christians. The need for redemption implies that being “under the Law” was
tantamount to bondage. Paul’s previous statement is conceptually parallel:
“Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law, having become a curse for us; for it is written, CURSED IS EVERY ONE THAT HANGS ON A TREE: that upon the Gentiles might come the blessing of Abraham in Christ Jesus; that we might receive the promise of the Spirit through faith” (Galatians 3:13-14).
The
result of this redemptive act is “adoption.” Men and women are not
“sons” or “children” of God by means of birth, but by “legal” adoption. All
human beings are God’s creation but not all are His children. Jews, likewise,
became sons by adoption; they do not automatically attain that position because
of their biological ancestry (compare Romans 8:15, 8:23, 9:4, Ephesians
1:5).
Because
Gentile Christians became God’s sons, He sent the “Spirit of his Son into
your hearts” (verse 6). The reference to the Spirit rounds off the long
argument that began at the start of the third chapter. Paul reminded them that
they had received the Spirit from a hearing of faith, not from the “works of
the Law” (Galatians 3:1-4).
Throughout
his long argument it should be kept in mind that Paul is addressing a specific
set of "works," the "works of the Law," and not good
works or human effort in general.
The
phrasing, the “spirit of his Son,” refers to the work of the Holy Spirit
to mold the believer’s life into the image of Jesus Christ. This same Spirit
prompted the Galatians to cry out, “Abba, Father.” What greater proof of
their acceptance into God’s covenant community could the Galatians possess?
Paul
concludes his entire argument in the statement, “So that you are no longer a
bondservant but a son; and if a son, then an heir through God.” Paul
declared that all who are “in Christ” are “heirs.” Since already
they are “sons” of God, filled with the Spirit, and heirs of the Promise, and
all this apart from the “works of the Law,” why do they now seek what
the Law could never deliver by subjecting themselves to its requirements?
Throughout
the argument, the temporal factor is prominent. The Law was an interim stage; by
design, it had a termination point. Christian believers are, consequently, no
longer “under the Law” but, instead, they are “in Christ.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
We encourage free discussions on the commenting system provided by the Google Blogger platform, with the stipulation that conversations remain civil. Comments voicing dissenting views are encouraged.